avatar Steve

You Did It! (Now LePage wants to un-do it.)

Over the past five months, EHSC supporters proved again that people power can triumph over political shenanigans, by soundly defeating the LePage administration and the chemical industry in their attempt to overturn Maine’s policies that protect children from the most dangerous chemicals in everyday products.

Early in this Legislative Session, the LePage administration publicly targeted the BPA phase out and the Kid-Safe Products Act as part of its rollback agenda. EHSC and our supporters and allies rose to the challenge, demonstrating the depth and intensity of public support for safer chemicals and children’s health to Legislators, the media, and the Governor. We also worked with many partners to marshal scientific evidence, expert testimony, and medical and business support. We harnessed the outrage of parents, grandparents, children, and families to send a loud and clear message: Maine supports safer chemicals!

Public support for safer products has continued to increase since the 2008 passage of the Kid-Safe Products Act. A February poll commissioned by the Alliance for a Clean and Healthy Maine found that 91% of Mainers surveyed believe it is important for Maine to identify the most dangerous chemicals currently used in making consumer products, and require manufacturers to replace them with safer ones as long as they are effective and affordable.

The Maine Legislature got the message. In the end, we won unanimous passage of a set of improvements and clarifications to the Kid-Safe Products Act that rejected a broad set of chemical industry-drafted proposals that would have gutted the law. We also won nearly unanimous approval of the phase out of BPA from baby bottles, sippy cups, and all reusable food and beverage containers, and overcame the Governor’s repeated threats to block it when he allowed the phase out to go into effect without his signature.

The Maine Legislature clearly understands that the public and the business community value common sense regulation of dangerous chemicals in everyday products. Unfortunately, the LePage administration and its corporate lobbyist advisors (many of whom have been hired into positions of authority in state government) still don’t get it. Earlier this month, we learned about new administration actions that threaten to dismantle the safer chemicals program in the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The administration has eliminated a half-time staff position to collect, manage, and analyze manufacturer reports on the use of BPA and other priority chemicals in children’s products. Now we don’t know if parents and retail businesses will get access to information about these chemicals they were promised under the law. The administration also just reassigned the only safer chemicals program staff person to completely different work.

So what is the LePage administration really up to? They aren’t saying. No program stakeholders were consulted about, or even informed of, these actions, and they have not been publicly announced. That’s why last week, EHSC wrote to the DEP seeking an explanation of these changes and how the Department plans to meet its responsibilities under the Law to protect Maine’s children. We also asked for an in-person meeting with key stakeholders to discuss the issues. You can read our statement and the letter here.

It’s no surprise that the chemical industry opposes policies that require disclosure of ingredients, health and safety testing, and replacement of dangerous chemicals with safer ones. Nor is it a surprise that they will use many tactics to stall reform. We had hoped for better from the LePage administration. But the Governor’s rollback agenda, his comments dismissing the overwhelming science of BPA’s toxicity, his insulting comment about women only growing “little beards” if they are exposed to BPA, and the recent DEP actions make it clear where the LePage administration stands (at least for the moment) – and it’s not with Maine children, parents, doctors, scientists, and small businesses.

So what’s next? We’re not going to let the administration dismantle the safer chemicals program behind closed doors and ignore the will of the public and the Legislature. We will demand access to public information, enforcement of the law and rules, and continued action to protect our children. We will engage our supporters and allies to hold the DEP and the LePage administration accountable. It’s going to take all of us, but if the first Legislative Session under the LePage administration proved anything, it demonstrated that Maine people, businesses and legislators are unwilling to compromise our health, even at the request of the Governor.  Round 1 is over, and Round 2 is starting. Ding, ding.

avatar Lauralee

Create Some Chemistry! Green Chemistry!

Kermit the frog has said, ‘it is not easy being green.’ After spending two inspirational days in Boston at the EPA Regional Science Workshop on Sustainable Green Chemistry, I disagree. It is becoming increasingly easier and more profitable to be green. I’m excited and energized because Green Chemistry is an important piece of the Sustainable Economy work at the Environmental Health Strategy Center (EHSC).

EHSC was one of the only representatives from Maine out of over 100 people present from a diverse group of stakeholders including government, education, business, venture capital, advocacy/NGO, and health care. The common thread? ALL were passionate and committed to Sustainable Green Chemistry. The tone was set early on Monday by talking about Green Chemistry not only as an environmental agenda but an economic, educational and community agenda. I couldn’t agree more! Our bioplastics project is all about providing a higher performance product that is better for our health, better for our environment and better for the economy. We are at an interesting cross roads and there is profound opportunity for New England to be a catalyst for others across the country on the need for safer chemicals.

Here are a few highlights of the successes and momentum building for Green Chemistry: using green chemical principles in producing new pharmaceutical products; a Connecticut high school Chemistry teacher incorporating green chemistry principals into her curriculum that above all, minimize current exposure of dangerous chemicals for teachers and students (and having fun while doing it!); the latest on cancer research related to harmful chemicals and the President’s Cancer Panel report supporting Green Chemistry initiatives; clear support for promoting greener, safer chemicals from top EPA officials; and a discussion on world wide impact of Green Chemistry and what countries like China and India are already doing…to name a few.

So what exactly is Green Chemistry? Green Chemistry protects human health and the environment while creating economic and job growth for societal benefit now and into the future. New England is taking the lead in redesigning materials from the get go to be safer and healthier for ourselves and our planet. At the EHSC, we want Maine to be in on the action. We also want you to spread the word. I met a Unity student, Tyler, doing an internship with the EPA. Tyler recently learned the term Green Chemistry and he couldn’t be more excited about it. Let’s spread the excitement and start thinking about what we all can do to Create Some Chemistry….Green Chemistry.

The 12 Principles of Green Chemicals

avatar Blog Admin

Taking a Second Look Upstream

Last Monday night I had a second opportunity to watch Living Downstream, the documentary film about Dr. Sandra Steingraber’s journey exposing links between cancer and environmental toxics. Environmental Health Strategy Center has been periodically showing the film as an introduction to our work to prevent harm from toxic chemical exposure. I was glad to be attending my second viewing in the company of 20 Mid-Coast Mainers at the Thomaston Public Library.

When I first saw the film, I naturally thought about Dr. Steingraber’s words from my own perspective as a 24 year old woman, living in a state that has one of the highest rates of cancer in the country. Right now I am grateful to be perfectly healthy, but I know that every day I’m exposed to cancer-causing chemicals and have little choice about it. I want to have kids within the next 10 years, and those kids will also be involuntarily exposed to toxic chemicals through contaminated breast milk and toxic every-day products. The laws that are supposed to protect people from toxic chemicals have tested less than 2% of prominently used chemicals for safety. 1 in 3 American women develop invasive cancer. From that point of view, it can be a grim picture.

This second time around, I have chosen a different viewpoint. At age 24 I represent a generation of young people with our entire careers ahead of us to make progress. And thanks to generations of activists that have come before me, the barriers to change have gotten steadily smaller. Steingraber’s personal hero, Rachel Carson, found it necessary to suffer breast cancer privately while she advocated publicly for regulating DDT and other toxic pesticides. Steingraber points out that 30 years of feminism stand between her and Carson, enabling her to speak out about her personal story struggling with cancer while exposing the scientific realities of carcinogenic toxics in our environment.

I would add that my own generation has a new advantage when it comes to fighting for our right to be healthy; there is an ever increasing amount of scientific research connecting toxics in our environment to cancer, learning disabilities, and reproductive harm, and both lawmakers and the private sector are showing greater responsiveness to these dangers. Last year, the President’s Cancer Panel submitted a report to the White House on the environmental links to cancer – another major step towards bringing this issue into mainstream awareness. The American Academy of Pediatrics has released a similar report this year. Some major corporations have even begun to self-impose stricter safety standards.

The people sitting to my left and right at Living Downstream – a teacher, a toxicologist, a breast cancer specialist, advocates for reduced pesticide reduction and land conservation – represent the many different voices that have helped bring strength to the issue here in Maine. Our challenge this year and in future years is to continue to translate this growing public awareness into real policies that permanently eradicate toxic chemicals from people’s bodies.